Welcome to your ultimate parenting resource


childsource.com keyword stats



Most current MSN search phrases:

Teaching Kids Respect discipline domestique
Petticoat Discipline parenting
PETTICOAT DISIPLINE behavior charts for discipline issues in
constantly moving while doing homework kindergarten discipline charts
LIPSTICK DISAPLINE christian domestic disipline
petticoat discipline stories petticoat discipline

Schoolchildren to Decide Own Sex

Given my age, by now I suppose I should behome, or how does a teacher consult with
accustomed to change. I've seen a lot of it.parents whose child has declared they are a
Some good, some bad, some absolutelydifferent sex without the parents' knowledge?
terrible, some fair and some unfair, both
stupid and intelligent. You name it, and ISB 777 was passed by the California
thought  I'd  seen  it  all.legislature and signed into law by the
governor late last year. It eliminated
But, I never thought I would live to see theEducation Code 212, which defined "sex" as
day when the crazies in the California"the biological condition or quality of being
legislature would actually think it's a gooda male or female human being." This new law
idea to allow schoolchildren to decide whichredefines the term "gender" for all
sex they want to be. Not their sexualschoolchildren by adding Education Code
preference, mind you, but whether they are210.7, which reads: "'Gender' means sex, and
male or female, notwithstanding theirincludes a person's gender identity and
anatomical  makeup.gender related appearance and behavior
whether or not stereotypically associated
California's Senate Bill 777 mandates, "Kidswith the person's assigned sex at
are going to be taught that they have thebirth…In short, this redefinition of
right to completely ignore their physicalgender states that you are what you choose to
anatomy and choose the status of being 'male'be regardless of your anatomical make-up.
or 'female.'" (NC Times Commentary, Just The(Emphasis added)…. SB 777 also uses
Facts, by Robert Tyler, general counsel forthis redefinition of gender to forbid
Advocates for Faith and Freedom, nonprofiteducators from discriminating against any
religious liberty and pro-family law firm,individual employee, student or other person
December  29,  2007).based upon that individual's unspoken claim
of being male or female, regardless of his or
As Robert Tyler notes, "Ignore your commonher  actual  sex."
sense, ignore your chromosomes and ignore
your anatomy. This is what your politiciansAdvocates of this legislation argue that
want to teach your kids in school. After all,"it's needed to protect gays and others with
California's kids have mastered reading,non-heterosexual orientations from being
writing and arithmetic, haven't they?" Toharassed in schools. Opponents say it will
illustrate the potential consequences of theforce teachers and school officials to
law, Mr. Tyler posed the question, "What willsilence anyone who is morally opposed to
prevent the 250-pound linebacker fromhomosexuality and allow anyone to claim
deciding he wants to share to share theprivileges based on self-defined sexual
locker  room  with  the  cheerleaders?"orientation." (Dan Walters, Sacramento Bee,
December  3,  2007).
For those who may scoff at this example of
the law's potential impact, "The Los AngelesMy sense is that this will stifle all free
Unified School District has already adoptedexpression about sexuality in the schools,
policies allowing boys to use girl'sthat it's another step along the path of
restrooms and locker rooms - and vice versa."Political Correctness to mass confusion and
The District's Reference Guide "even tellsresentment. And, no doubt it will add to the
teachers they need to refer to students usingincome of the trial lawyers, who will game
the student's preferred pronoun. And ofthe system with litigation to create and/or
course, it prohibits the teachers fromprotect  clients'  rights,  real or imagined.
disclosing a student's chosen gender to the
student's parents." (The Jawa Report,In October 2007, state Senator McClintock
California Schoolchildren to Decide Their Ownwrote, "After all, if courts begin ruling
Sex,  December  31,  2007).that exclusion is indeed a form of
discriminatory bias - which is clearly the
And, the "Los Angeles Unified School Districtintent of this bill - there are no groups
has already implemented a policy that statesmore excluded or less tolerated in the public
a boy perceiving himself to be a girl may useschools today than evangelical Christians,
the girls' restroom and locker room. He mayorthodox  Jews  and  traditional  Catholics."
also participate in girls' sports and other
female-only activities." (Testimony byThe oft quoted observation, "the asylum is
legislative liaison Meredith Turney ofbeing run by the inmates," seems to describe
Capitol Resource Institute, Newsmax.com,California's political system perfectly. If
January  11,  2008).this didn't have such serious potential
consequences, it would be downright
How crazy is this? Children can now declarelaughable.
which sex they are without telling their
parents. How, I wonder, does that work at© 2008 Harris R.



1 A B C D E 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129